WikiAuthorsTang, Xiaobing

Tang, Xiaobing

Bio Sketch

Xiaobing Tang (唐小兵) is a scholar of modern and contemporary Chinese literature, visual culture, history of art, sound studies, and cultural politics (web-verified via his Chinese University of Hong Kong research profile and OpenAlex: author A5037470049; earlier long US posting at the University of Southern California, 2006 record). His monographs include Global Space and the Nationalist Discourse of Modernity: The Historical Thinking of Liang Qichao (Stanford UP, 1996), Chinese Modern: The Heroic and the Quotidian (Duke UP, 2000), Origins of the Chinese Avant-Garde: The Modern Woodcut Movement (2007) and Visual Culture in Contemporary China: Paradigms and Shifts (Cambridge UP, 2015). He is the only literature scholar among the Intimus editors' selections, and the only contributor whose theoretical frame is a full-length application of Jean Baudrillard's consumer-semiotics to the domestic interior.

Key Works

  • *Decorating Culture* (1998/2006) — the literary-critical reading of He Dun's Didi nihao through Baudrillard's "system of objects": consumption as practiced ideology, interior design as sign-value generator and acculturation mechanism ("to interiorize the political economy of the sign"), and the transformed domicile as emergent, injured interiority.
  • Global Space and the Nationalist Discourse of Modernity: The Historical Thinking of Liang Qichao (Stanford UP, 1996)
  • Chinese Modern: The Heroic and the Quotidian (Duke UP, 2000) — episodes in the creation of Chinese modernity across literary, visual, theatrical and cinematic texts
  • Origins of the Chinese Avant-Garde: The Modern Woodcut Movement (2007)
  • Visual Culture in Contemporary China: Paradigms and Shifts (Cambridge UP, 2015)

Key Concepts

Concepts associated with this author that have pages in this wiki:

  • sign-value — the "explicit sign value" for which commodities are "consumed not so much for their utility or use value" (p. 331)
  • system-of-objects — the Baudrillard system Heping "readily embraces," commanding "the sign language of commodities" (p. 330)
  • interiorisation — the mechanism the essay names: interior design "instilling a sign-consciousness in our most private and personal sphere" (p. 332)
  • conspicuous-consumption — Heping as "conspicuous consumer"; display read for oneself
  • consummative-mobilization — needs as alibi; the "central legitimizing process of the late capitalist mode of production" (p. 331)
  • injured-interiority — Dandan's death as the announcement of an "injured form of interiority" (p. 333)
  • interiority — "an emergent form of interiority" (headnote); "an age of no interiority"
  • interior-design — "a business and generator of sign value" compelled to "speak a more intimate parole" (p. 332)
  • consumerism — the decoration craze; "a concrete passion" of urban youth (p. 329)
  • spectacle — the "urban spectacle of desire"; the spectacle as "illusion of differentiation" (pp. 331–332)

Relevance to the Core Research

Tang supplies the wiki's strongest bridge between the consumerism/Baudrillard cluster and the interiority/interior-design clusters — the link the Intimus editors built their reader to make but never otherwise state at full length. Three contributions are load-bearing: (1) the interiorization thesis — interior design "by instilling a sign-consciousness in our most private and personal sphere, serves to acculturate us to the system of sign-objects" — which converts the wiki's taste-and-consumption material (taste, consumerism) into a mechanism of subject-formation at room scale; (2) the display-for-oneself twist — consumption as "a sign of personal success rather than invidious distinction" — which extends the wiki's distinction line (symbolic-capital, fashion) with a consumer-side variant Madigan & Munro's respectability households invert; and (3) the injured interiority — "an age of no interiority" in which interiority is "recommended as spiritual resilience at a moment of worldly crisis" and questioned as alibi — which gives the wiki's interiority cluster its political-economic limit-case and its global-transmutation question.

Source Support

Source notes in this wiki drawn from this author's work:

Built with LogoFlowershow