WikiConceptsAtrium Hotel

Atrium Hotel

Definition

The atrium hotel-shopping complex is the late-modern building type John Portman invented with the Hyatt Regency Atlanta (1967) and developed through the Westin Peachtree Plaza (1976), the Los Angeles Bonaventure (1976), and the Detroit Renaissance Center (1977): a megastructure whose multi-story atrium podium reproduces the city's streets, piazzas, and shopping galleries inside a single building, sheathed by a reflective-glass tower. Marinic traces the type's genealogy to the nineteenth-century commercial arcade — "Parisian passages and other interior urban environments such as the Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II (1865) in Milan, Galerias Pacifico (1889) in Buenos Aires, and the Old Arcade (1890) in Cleveland served as forerunners of the atrium hotel-shopping complexes of the mid-twentieth century" — whose "architectural language… was appropriated by John Portman for his unique interior-exterior aesthetic in America." The type's method is the turning of "building exteriors… outside-in to create autonomous internal plazas, encapsulated landscapes, and hermetic commercial zones"; its urban logic is the city-within-a-city; and its spatial register is the interior hyperspace that Jameson and Baudrillard theorized on the Bonaventure.

The type is double-coded in time: a "forerunner of twenty-first-century interior hyperspaces in Las Vegas, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and elsewhere," and simultaneously "temples of consumerism subjected to market pressures and changing tastes" — "his late modernist hotel-retail interiors were among the first to be adapted in the postmodern wave." The atrium hotel is thus the icon whose interior is consumed: the type that "eventually gained stature as enduring design icons" while "recent interior renovations have largely ignored the original materiality and civic gravitas of the unique 'Portman effect.'"

Key Thinkers

  • John Portman — the type's architect-developer inventor; his hybrid perspective ("Portman's hotel-retail-commercial complexes transformed downtowns into increasingly isolated, transactional, and privatized forms of urbanism") and his own 1986 postmodern follies at the Westin Peachtree Plaza (see kitsch). No author page (see log).
  • Fredric Jameson — the Bonaventure atrium as postmodern "hyperspace," the "impossible" representation of "a 'new world of multinational capital.'"
  • Jean Baudrillard — the Bonaventure as "an ideal inner world which replicates the city within a building" and "an unintentional parody of modernism."
  • Gregory Marinic — the type's renovation historian: the three-case critique of the Portman originals' "material memory."
  • interior-urbanism — the atrium hotel's urban content: lobbies as piazzas, corridors as streets, galleries as covered retail streets.
  • material-memory — what the renovations erase: the original materiality and civic gravitas of the "Portman effect."
  • arcades — the type's nineteenth-century ancestor; the blurred threshold between street and interior.
  • privatised-public-space — the urban condition the type installs: "isolated, transactional, and privatized forms of urbanism."
  • hermetic-seal — the hermetic commercial zone: "autonomous internal plazas, encapsulated landscapes."
  • iconic-architecture — the atrium hotels as "enduring design icons" whose iconhood survives only in the unrenovated shell.
  • terrain-vague — the voluminous, unarticulated spatial gratuities of the early podiums, since "value-engineered into leasable space."
  • kitsch — the 1986 follies episode: the type's own author recasting the podium "as a context for temporal interiorities which addressed conventional preferences and consumerism."
  • postmodernism — the type's spatial register: "interior spatial postmodernity" beneath a "modern" reflective skin.

Source Support

Sources in the wiki that discuss this concept:

  • Internal disconnect: Material memory in the John Portman originals (Marinic 2018) — the founding source: the arcades genealogy, the three case studies (Hyatt Regency Atlanta's [Irreverent] dematerialization, Westin Peachtree Plaza's [Superficial] adaptation, Detroit Renaissance Center's [Radical] intervention), the "too big to fail" thesis, the single-loaded retail critique, and the Lefebvre/Baudrillard/Jameson frame.
  • Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (Jameson 1984/1983) — the Bonaventure as the postmodern hyperspace that disorients ("cognitive mapping" fails); the atrium's escalators, glass elevators, and mirrored lobby as the space that cannot be positioned in.
  • Structures of Atmosphere (Baudrillard 1968/2006) — the sign-system interior at room scale; the chapter scales the same consumption-analysis up to the atrium ("the podium base of the Detroit Renaissance Center spatializes Baudrillard's theory of consumption… The Consumer Society").
  • Metropolitan hybrids: Programming for a thriving urbanity (Luna 2018) — the type generalized and contested: "The second definition deals with the programmatic relationship of trying to create a city within the building. The architectural shell acts as a setting, and programming takes a priority role. To use Las Vegas as an example again, this effect happens in most hotels where the intent is to keep visitors inside a single building doing a variety of city activities like shopping, eating out at new restaurants, attending a theater performance, visiting museums, gambling at casinos, walking through parks, and seeing new art in galleries, all while remaining inside the building." Luna reads the atrium-hotel condition as metropolitan architecture's second definition and its microcosmic autonomy ("these buildings… can operate in a suburban condition, where they would become an attractor (like hotels on the Las Vegas Strip)") — then redirects it: the metropolitan hybrid "would change the notion of a 'city within a city' to a 'system within a city'" (see interior-urbanism, metropolitan-architecture).
  • Public spheres: Hong Kong's interior urbanism (Solomon 2018) — the type's political end-state: the atrium as the city's contested civic plaza. Solomon documents "activists who would form the Occupy Movement… on October 15, [opening] an encampment on the plaza underneath the atrium of the HSBC Main Building, where they remained for almost a year until they were forcibly cleared by court bailiffs on August 27, 2012" — the atrium ("with its open ground plan below suspended banking halls") functioning, on Sundays, as the foreign domestic workers' commons and, from 2011, as Occupy Hong Kong's camp. Where the Portman atrium's publicness is managed consumption ("forums for the guilty pleasures of consumerism"), the HSBC atrium's is contested claim ("Owned by the bank but legally designated a public passageway, a judge had ruled the occupation fell outside its intended use") — the atrium type completing its arc from internalized piazza to political square. See privatised-public-space, public-sphere, interior-urbanism.
  • Jean Baudrillard: The Defence of the Real (Butler 1999) — the book-length secondary study that reads Baudrillard "in his own terms": the paradox of the sign (paradox-of-the-sign), simulation as the realization rather than the loss of the real (simulation-hyperreality), seduction as the limit to simulation, and the doubling power of theory (doubling, the-real, double-strategy).

Open Questions

  • Is the atrium hotel a building type or an urban type — does its significance lie in the room-sized luxury hotel or in the city-sized urbanism it internalizes? The chapter's case studies suggest the two come apart: the tower endures, the urbanism is value-engineered away.
  • The type is "deemed too big to fail" yet "required intensive modifications to remain economically viable" — is the atrium hotel economically self-consuming, or are its failures those of the single-loaded retail and social-space generosity Marinic identifies as design choices?
  • Portman's follies were his own "postmodern" recasting of his "Brutalist" podium — is the atrium hotel's stylistic instability (late modernist shell, postmodern interior) intrinsic to the type, or an accident of its architect-developer authorship?
  • Can the atrium hotel be renovated without erasure — what would a renovation that preserved "material memory" while addressing retail economics look like, and is SOM's glass-ring mezzanine the model?
  • Solomon's HSBC case shows the atrium's publicness contested rather than staged — is the Portman type's failure of civic gravitas therefore a failure of claim (publicness as owner's gift) rather than of design? Can an atrium be designed so its publicness is occupiable rather than granted — and what would the type's architect-developer authorship have to surrender (public-sphere, commons)?
Built with LogoFlowershow