WikiConceptsObjective Irony

Objective Irony

Definition

Objective irony is Baudrillard's name, in Fatal Strategies (1983), for the object's mode of resistance and victory over the subject — an irony that is not the subject's pose but the world's own duplicity. "It is objective irony that lies in wait for us, the irony of the fulfillment of the object without regard for the subject or its alienation. In the phase of alienation, it is subjective irony that triumphs; it is the subject that constitutes an insoluble challenge to the blind world." Now the poles have reversed: "The power of the object lies in its irony. Difference is always serious, but indifference is ironic." The evil genie of the object, the silence of the masses, the "parodic behavior of disappearance," the fate of polls, and the revenge of the analyzed object are all its figures. Baudrillard's favored micro-form is the Witz (joke/wit): "language itself knows it, and it alone knows it" — "objective irony (of the Witz)… is the objective form of this dénouement." The concept is the antidote to "eternally critical theory": "there is perhaps another, more joyous way of seeing things, and of finally substituting for eternally critical theory an ironic theory." It is the operative mode of the principle of Evil and the halo of the supremacy of the object. See principle-of-evil, supremacy-of-the-object, fatal-strategies, the-secret.

Key Thinkers

  • Jean Baudrillard — the concept's author: "objective irony… lies in wait for us"; "indifference is ironic"; "the objective form of this dénouement" (1983).
  • Friedrich Nietzsche — the model of the "more joyous" ironic theory against critical melancholy.
  • Jacques Soulillou — the wiki's theorist of ornament as order's appearance; a neighbouring register of the decorative's irony.
  • Sigmund Freud — the Witz (joke) and its "objective" operation, which Baudrillard says Freud "only barely missed wrecking."

Source Support

Sources in the wiki that discuss this concept:

Open Questions

  • Is objective irony a discoverable structure of the world, or an interpretive stance Baudrillard adopts? The concept risks making every failure of prediction evidence of the object's cunning.
  • The book distinguishes "subjective irony" (the subject's challenge to the blind world) from "objective irony." Does the wiki's own ironic register (Oulipo, the decorative, weak architecture) belong to either?
  • Can "ironic theory" escape the fate of critical theory, or is it simply critique in a different mood?
Built with LogoFlowershow