Everyday Life
Everyday Life
Definition
Everyday life names the theoretical object of the ordinary, quotidian existence of subjects — the realm of habit, repetition, consumption, work, and domesticity that philosophy, sociology, and cultural theory have variously diagnosed as mystified (needing theory to reveal its truth), as a site of creative resistance (de Certeau's tactics, Lefebvre's critique and "moments"), or as immanent productive life (Nietzsche, Bergson, Hardt & Negri). Colebrook shows the two poles — dialectical/critical and immanent/utopian — both rest on a normative concept of "life," and proposes reading the everyday instead as discontinuous and perverse, "a constant and overwhelming refusal of life." The fullest philosophical definition in the wiki is Heller's: everyday life is "the aggregate of those individual reproduction factors which, pari passu, make social reproduction possible" — the terrain where the person reproduces themselves (as particularity or individuality) by appropriating a ready-made world of objects, customs, and language, and where everyday life "is not an attitude… It is the objective fundament of every social action, institution, of human social life in general." Distinguished here from Everyday Architecture (ordinary architectural production), everyday life names the lived experience of inhabitants/users.
Key Thinkers
- Michel de Certeau — strategies vs. tactics; everyday life invents itself by "poaching" on the property of others.
- Claire Colebrook — deconstructs the normative "life" in theories of the everyday; tactics vs. strategies.
- Rita Felski — reconstructs the everyday via repetition, home, and habit; feminist "peace with the everyday."
- María Pía Chirinos — everyday life grounded in dependence, practices, and work (MacIntyre).
- Henri Lefebvre — the critique of everyday life, alienation, and the theory of moments.
- Devorah Kalekin-Fishman — sociological survey of everyday life theorization; lifeworld, sociation, and the civilizing process.
- Peter Berger & Thomas Luckmann — the everyday as "paramount reality," taken for granted as self-evident facticity; typification and the social stock of knowledge.
- Maurice Blanchot — the everyday as the non-event, "without a subject," holding "the principle of its own critique."
- Georges Perec — the "infra-ordinary"; recovering the banal through inventory and description.
- Harold Garfinkel — ethnomethodology; the rejection of the "cultural dope"; the everyday as taken-for-granted practical action.
- Pierre Bourdieu — the everyday as the site of the habitus: the practical, bodily, pre-conscious dispositions through which ordinary life is produced and reproduced.
- Georg Simmel — the metropolitan everyday: the intensification of nervous stimulation, the blasé attitude, and the hypertrophy of objective culture.
- Paul Virilio — the "aesthetics of disappearance" and picnolepsy as a phenomenology of the quotidian grounded in absence and perception; the "infra-ordinary" as a refusal of "the ideal hierarchy of the crucial and the incidental."
- Lars Spuybroek — inhabitation as appropriation; the ontological spectrum of things (object → thing → stuff → mess → trash → waste) as the fabric of everyday domestic life.
- Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi — the "symbolic ecology" of the home: empirical evidence that everyday objects (not artworks) carry the meanings that order private life; visual values as socially constructed.
- Donald Norman — the cognitive psychology of everyday things; affordances, conceptual models, and the "taught helplessness" produced by bad design; the "twenty thousand everyday things" we must learn.
- Agnes Heller — the everyday as "the aggregate of those individual reproduction factors which, pari passu, make social reproduction possible"; organized by species-essential objectivation 'in itself' (tools, custom, language); the subject of everyday life under alienation is particularity, while the individual consciously orders a life within it; against Heidegger, the everyday "can be changed, humanized and democratized."
- Georges Teyssot — the psychological register: the "comforting habitual and repetitious nature of everyday life" whose suppression is pathogenic; the everyday as the psyche's cushion, its interior housed in the over-mirrored room (1996/2006). See aesthetic-boredom, habit.
- J Macgregor Wise — the territorialist register: the everyday's hums and stuff as milieu-creation; cultures as "ways of territorializing, the ways one makes oneself at home," judged "by its operations, not by the possession of products" (de Certeau & Giard quoted p. 394); home "established by… the accumulation of habitual acts" (2000/2006). See home, milieu, habit.
- Alf Lüdtke — the historiographical register: the everyday as Alltag, the object of Alltagsgeschichte; "the life and survival of those who have remained largely anonymous in history—the 'nameless' multitudes in their workaday trials and tribulations" (p. 4); the everyday as the ground of Eigensinn and complaisance rather than of heroic resistance.
Related Concepts
- Everyday Architecture — the architectural production side of the quotidian.
- Dwelling — the existential being-at-home the everyday presumes.
- Consumerism — the commodified everyday.
- Derive — psychogeographic practice in the everyday city.
- The Everyday vs. Iconic Architecture — the mundane vs. the spectacular, consumerist icon (Felski vs. Sklair).
- Theories of the Everyday — the internal debate: affirm (Felski), transform (Lefebvre), resist (de Certeau), refuse (Colebrook), humanize (Heller).
- Habitus — the bodily, pre-conscious dispositions through which the everyday is produced and reproduced.
- Aesthetics of Disappearance — Virilio's picnoleptic phenomenology of the quotidian; the "infra-ordinary."
- Appropriation — the active process of everyday inhabitation; habit and play as its rhythms.
- Thing-Ontology — the ontological status of the ordinary objects of everyday life.
- Affordances — the perceived action possibilities of everyday objects; Norman's design principle.
- Conceptual Models — the mental models people form of how everyday things work.
- Aesthetic Boredom — the negative emotion toward a space lacking inhabitability; an everyday aesthetic criterion (Franco).
- Particularity and Individuality — Heller's breakdown of who the everyday subject is.
- Species-Essentiality — the generic pole against which everyday (particularistic) life is measured.
- Objectivation 'In Itself' and 'For Itself' — the paradigm classifying the everyday's building blocks and the generic activities that transcend it.
- Homogenization — the objective criterion of emergence from the everyday.
- Repetition — the everyday's structural principle (Heller) and redeemable temporality (Felski).
- Doxa and Epistémē — everyday knowledge as opinion, verified only in practical action.
- Nycthemeral — the everyday's day-slice given architectural form: Perec's timetable as the quotidian's spatial script; with heptadian and thematic-arrangement as the counter-layouts.
Source Support
-
Becoming Places (Dovey 2010) — the everyday as place-becoming's substrate and power's infiltrator: "everyday life continues – here and now, in this body, in this space" (p. 6, against the constructionist "meaningless field"); the Merdeka Square infiltrations — beggars, vendors, prostitutes and homeless whose rhizomatic practices "cut across the idealized nationalist symbolism of the square" and "tell a truth that is not the official truth" (pp. 153, 163); the Bangkok streetlife ("children's play, watching television and a broad range of economic and social activities" in the troks, p. 170) and its diurnal/nocturnal cycles; the kampung's public/private spill ("domestic life spills permanently into 'public' space," p. 89). The everyday here is the force that monuments fence out and covenants foreclose — the becoming-side of the wiki's everyday cluster. See loose-parts, practiced-place, informal-urbanism. Sources in the wiki that discuss this concept:
-
The History of Everyday Life (Lüdtke ed. 1995) — the everyday as the object of a whole historiography: Alltagsgeschichte reconstructs "the life and survival of those who have remained largely anonymous in history" (p. 4); it treats conditions for action as "ambivalent": "though given, they are in equal measure a product" (p. 7); and it discovers workers' attitudes under fascism as neither resistance nor consent but complaisance and Eigensinn. See alltagsgeschichte, historical-experience, lebensweise.
-
The Apartment (Perec 1974/2006) — the everyday's spatial script, in the cluster's only text by Perec himself: the apartment's "ideal dividing-up" running "in accordance with a procedure that is unequivocal, sequential and nycthemeral" — "The activities of the day correspond to slices of time, and to each slice of time there corresponds one room of the apartment" — the day the planner "want[s] us to live" laid out 07.00–22.00; the gendered division of that day (the mother's circuit of housework, shopping and cooking; the father's office; the child's school); the room-furniture definitions ("a dining-room is a room in which there are a table and chairs, and often a sideboard"); and the alternatives — functional relationships, the senses (heptadian rhythms, thematic arrangements) — as the everyday's counter-layouts. See infra-ordinary, nycthemeral.
-
Puzzle (Carley 2018) — the design-pedagogical register: the constraint-armature ensuring students acknowledge "the life of the interior of a building in time: activated by the extraordinary events and ordinary rituals and performances of everyday life"; the infra-ordinary and the outlandish "artfully combined" (Wardrip-Fruin via Carley); Perec's enumeration of quotidian spaces as the everyday's literary recovery, transposed to the studio. See infra-ordinary, voluntary-constraints.
-
Everyday Life (Heller 1970) — the primary philosophical theory: everyday life as individual self-reproduction making social reproduction possible; the heterogeneity of the everyday; the organizational framework of objectivation 'in itself' (tools, custom, language); everyday knowledge (doxa), contact, space, and time; the anti-Heideggerian claim that the everyday can be humanized.
-
Being and Time (Heidegger 1927) — the ontological foundation of everydayness as average, undifferentiated Dasein; "average everydayness" as the starting point of the existential analytic; das Man as the "who" of everydayness; fallenness as absorption in the world of concern.
-
The Metropolis and Mental Life (Simmel 1903) — the metropolitan type and the blasé attitude as the psychology of the modern everyday.
-
Death of the architect (Berger 2018) — the appropriation register of the everyday: the inhabitants' resourceful "misuse" of things as the everyday's designed-in plain sight — "in 'Appropriating the Everyday' for everyone, each day, and every situation, we apply and use things and ideas for the simplest daily functions: a coat over the handrail, a cafe mug on the windowsill, or other applications that are considered as a resourceful 'misuse' of an item or situation" — the everyday's tactics named as a design resource that would let users "be part of the (design) process, shaping the environment as an active part of habitation." The chapter's frame (the death of the architect) makes the everyday's appropriation the legitimate continuation of design rather than its residue. See appropriation, aneignung.
-
The Human Condition — Arendt's analysis of labor, the social, and the "society of laborers" as the public organization of biological life; the everyday as the sphere of necessity colonizing the political.
-
Megaprojects: Beneath the Pavement, Excess (Jones & Moreno-Carranco)
-
Anthropology and the Everyday, from Comfort to Terror (Ries 2002)
-
Complicity and Collusion in the Mediation of Everyday Life (Silverstone 2002)
-
Spatial Stories (de Certeau 1984/2006) — the everyday's spatial chapter (book chapter 9, Intimus reprint): "Every story is a travel story – a spatial practice. For this reason, spatial practices concern everyday tactics" (p. 79) — from the alphabet of spatial indication ("Take a left") to the daily "news"; narratives "organize walks. They make the journey, before or during the time the feet perform it"; and the everyday's spatial ontology: "space is a practiced place," the street "transformed into a space by walkers" (p. 80). See practiced-place, strategy-and-tactic.
-
Proximities (Taylor & Preston 2006) — interior-design theory's own everyday register: modernist paradigms subjected to criticism that "engage[s] the mundane and the ordinary" and "reframe[s] the discussion through specificity and the implication of the body in space" (p. 12).
-
Toward a Psychology of Everyday Living (Højholt & Schraube 2015) — the "conduct of everyday life" (critical psychology).
-
Architecture in Everyday Life (Upton 2002) — everyday life as embodied habitus in organized time and space.
-
Spatial seductions (Meninato 2018) — the everyday object's artistic elevation and return: Duchamp's readymade as the "subtle and hidden qualities of everyday objects" designated as art ("the artist is no longer the one who produces the work of art; instead, he chooses it"); Kienholz's tableaux built from "the self-concept of our society… inferred from its garbage"; and the transfer of everyday-object tactics (displacement, fragmentation, ready-made) to interior architecture and adaptive reuse — the everyday interiorities of the title. See readymade, tableau, everyday-architecture.
-
The Revolution of Everyday Life (Vaneigem 2001) — survival vs. living; the revolutionary transformation of the everyday.
-
What is 'Everyday Life'? (Thompson 2013) — the everyday's imaginary dimension, politics, and "Real Citizenship."
-
Everyday Life: The Transformation of the Meaning of Agency (Başeren 2011) — Situationist agency (Debord, Vaneigem, Lefebvre) and cultural studies (Willis, Hebdige); pseudocyclical time and the spectacle's passivity.
-
Daily Life as a Phenomenon of Modern Philosophical Discourse (Betilmerzaeva et al. 2019) — phenomenological (Husserl, Schütz) and ethnomethodological (Garfinkel) approaches; life-world, intersubjectivity, and background expectations.
-
Everyday Practices and Practical Formalization (Koev 2010) — Heidegger's indifferent everydayness, disturbance tendency, and Garfinkel's practical formalizations; the ready-to-hand/present-at-hand distinction.
-
'Everyday Life:' a sui generis ontology? (Paolucci 2015) — Agnes Heller's ontology of everyday life; reproduction, alienation, objectification, and the dialectic of everyday/non-everyday.
-
Home: Territory and Identity (Wise 2000/2006) — the everyday's territorialist register, and the culture-operations thesis: the everyday's hums, whistles and stuff ("we whistle a happy tune"; "Whistle while you work") as its elementary spatial practice — "we create a milieu" (p. 391); the everyday's marking repertoire ("a coat saves the seat… legs stretched out, newspaper up… words on a t-shirt," p. 392) as the unconscious boundary-drawing the tactics literature theorizes; and the culture-level formulation via de Certeau & Giard: "Culture is judged by its operations, not by the possession of products" (quoted p. 394) — "Cultures are ways of territorializing, the ways one makes oneself at home," existing "only in their expressions (and their repetition)" (p. 394). Where Felski reconstructs the everyday through repetition, home and habit, Wise supplies their Deleuzian mechanism: home as the accumulation of habitual acts (the territorialization thesis), habit as milieu-maker — the everyday given its spatial vocation. See home, milieu, habit.
-
The Urban Process under Capitalism: A Framework for Analysis
-
The Everyday: Wandering, Wondering. Re-Positioning Architecture, Spectacle and Everyday Life
-
The Bilbao Effect: Is 'Starchitecture' All It's Cracked Up to Be?
-
Iconic Buildings in the Making of City Identity: The Role of Aspirational Identity Artefacts
-
Consumerism and Identity: Some Psychoanalytic Considerations
-
The Social Construction of Reality (Berger & Luckmann) — the everyday as "paramount reality," typification, and the social stock of knowledge.
-
Cultural Phenomenology and the Everyday (Clucas 2000) — a materialist phenomenology of daily life; the everyday as philosophy's excluded non-philosophy.
-
Rethinking Everyday Life (Seigworth & Gardiner 2004) — the everyday as "open totality"; Lefebvre's theory of moments via Leibniz's monad.
-
The Moving Ground: Locating Everyday Life (Driscoll 2001) — the everyday as the Other of culture; cultural studies' authorization through its unknowability.
-
Culturally 'Doped' or Not? (Conroy) — de Certeau vs. Garfinkel vs. Fiske; the "cultural dope" question; the everyday as a "gloss term."
-
Outline of a Theory of Practice (Bourdieu 1977) — the habitus and practical logic as the sociological ground of the everyday's ordinary practice.
-
The Logic of Practice (Bourdieu 1990) — habitus, "feel for the game," illusio, and practical faith as states of the body.
-
Bourdieu for Architects (Webster 2011) — the architectural field's "veil of idealism"; taste, distinction, and the reproduction of the profession's cultural capital.
-
The Aesthetics of Disappearance (Virilio 1991) — picnolepsy and the "infra-ordinary"; the quotidian as structured by absence and the "separation of the seen from the unseen."
-
Habit and Inhabit, Stuff and Trash (Spuybroek 2025) — inhabitation as appropriation; the ontological spectrum of things; habit and play as the rhythms of everyday domestic life; hoarding and decluttering as pathologies of inhabitation.
-
The Nature of Ordinary Objects (Bucchioni 2022) — the ontological status of ordinary objects as mind-dependent (purely intentional); a "third way" between realism and eliminativism.
-
Design and Order in Everyday Life (Csikszentmihalyi 1991) — the "symbolic ecology" of the home; empirical evidence that ordinary objects (not artworks) carry the meanings that order everyday life; visual values as socially constructed.
-
Architecture for Everyday Life (Swedish Association of Architects 2010) — the Swedish consensus model: everyday life as the foundation of architectural quality; "all homes must satisfy the same requirements."
-
The Design of Everyday Things (Norman 1990) — the cognitive engineering of everyday objects; affordances, conceptual models, visibility, mapping, and feedback as design principles; "taught helplessness" from bad design; the "twenty thousand everyday things" we must learn.
-
Everyday life in the real world (Maycroft 2007) — empirical critique of everyday-life orthodoxy; argues for empirical over philosophical/cultural approaches; the work/everyday distinction is blurrier than theory suggests; "resistance to everyday life" rather than resistance from it.
-
Benjamin for Architects (Elliott 2011) — Benjamin's street-level perspective on the city prefigures Situationist psychogeography; his concern with the decay of bourgeois dwelling and the everyday experience of the modern metropolis.
-
Semiotics and Hermeneutics of the Everyday (Yoka & Paschalidis eds. 2015) — historiographical survey of the everyday's canonization: acknowledged long before its late-20th-century theorization as "a spatio-temporal backdrop, a framework of action"; the everyday's merging of cyclical and linear time weaves micro-level social experience with macro-level socio-cultural development (production, reproduction, and refashioning of norms); canonized largely by the anthropological turn (Garfinkel's ethnomethodology, Goffman's dramaturgical approach, microhistory, Alltagsgeschichte) focused on people as active agents and the eroding of private/public, local/global, material/symbolic distinctions.
-
Politicizing the interior (Teston 2018) — the everyday's design-disciplinary elevation: "many cultural theorists elevate the micro-subversions of the everyday as a diversion from the monotony of the mundane" (the stolen hotel shampoo, the screened phone call); commodity consumption "emit[s] a signal representing our chosen identity"; both models "imply that everyday life is dull, yet by researching the commonplace we elevate it. We lift it up in the same way that cultural theorists have elevated micro-subversions and material culture." Her thesis: "Design is embedded in the everyday and has intrinsic value" — everyday objects, underserved populations, modestly detailed buildings — and "by analyzing the everyday, we can see the authenticity and the capacity of 'placeness' in the most ordinary of non-places."
-
Volatile Architectures (Drobnick 2002/2006) — the everyday/anti-everyday inversion and its olfactory politics: the museum visit "olfactorily coded to be outside the routine of the ordinary and everyday" (p. 92) — smell as the medium that marks an experience as other to the everyday (the aromatopia's heterotopian claim); the audience's demand for "a sensorially complete experience – to counteract the anaesthetized routine of everyday life" (p. 90) — the everyday as the anaesthetized state the museum's senses cure; and the valuation thesis: "Marginalized, private, or everyday experiences, such as those typically associated with women's domestic labour, can be given distinction and value" (p. 94) — the everyday's non-visual experiences (cooking, cleaning, domestic odour) as what the visual museum cannot collect, and what the olfactory turn honours. See aromatopia, olfaction, gender-and-the-interior.
-
Event-space: A performance model for spatial design (Hannah 2018) — the everyday's performative re-description: "our banal everyday environments can be perceived and utilized as continually fluctuating performances" — the quotidian as event rather than backdrop; Tschumi's "spectacle of everyday life" (via Hannah: "a formulation of the quotidian event focuses on what Tschumi refers to as the 'spectacle of everyday life'") as the everyday's own spectacular form; the everyday's participants numbered without exception ("manifold, fragmented, overlapping, and mobile, implicating all as participants in the plethora of life's daily performances"); and the political edge: McKenzie's "perform or else!" in a world that has become "a designed environment in which an array of global performances unfold," with prescribed performances conventionally reinforced rather than challenged. Where the wiki's everyday cluster theorizes habit, comfort, and practice, this register theorizes the everyday as staging — see event-space, spatial-performativity, spatial-dramaturgy, spectacle.
-
Living in Glass Houses (Melchionne 1998/2006) — the everyday's aesthetic register, the page's link to the everyday-aesthetics movement: art's own function redefined through the everyday — as fine art, the Glass House "does exactly what it is supposed to do, namely, to refine and intensify experiences already available to us in everyday life" (p. 230) — and the everyday itself as art's site of practice: "the ordinary process of inhabiting our homes is an artistic practice, a kind of environmental art" (p. 229), an art "made and remade on a daily basis" (p. 230), whose instrument is the habit-repertoire and whose labour is tidying. The chapter thereby completes the Felski line (repetition, home, habit as affirmable) with its strongest formulation: the everyday's practices are not merely worth aesthetic attention — they are the material of art's refinement ("an extremely refined version of what any sensitive homemaker creates," p. 230). See art-of-domesticity, habit, environmental-aesthetics.
-
The Kitchen as a Place to Be (Potter 1990/2006) — the everyday's domestic-instrument register, from the design side: food's temporality as the everyday's most basic continuity-agency — "the taking of food being a prime agent of precisely that [continuity]. There is nothing really instant about food; although meals are pretty basic, there is process, ritual, and continuity involved, and I think this kitchen had the feel of that" (p. 268) — the meal's process-ritual as what the kitchen's design should carry ("the feel of a kitchen"), against the time-and-labour-saving kitchen ("There is next-to-no gadgetry: this is the opposite extreme to the highly generalised and frictionless modern kitchen in which time and labour saving comes first," p. 266). And the everyday's aesthetic dictum transposed to the instrument: "Schnabel's advice for the food of the spirit – that music is to be experienced, not consumed – is also something to try for in kitchen design" (p. 265) — experience, not consumption, as the design criterion for the room where the everyday's reproduction happens. Where the page's theorists position the everyday, Potter designs its room: the everyday defended at the scale of the instrument (see kitchen, taylorism, mechanization).
-
Architecture and Interior: A Roam of One's Own (Taylor 2001/2006) — the everyday as the discipline's method, performed rather than theorized: the editors' headnote — "through the use of close and gentle observation, it positions intimate detail and temporality in the discourse of interior design as a creative act" (p. 339) — is enacted in the essay's own material: the Melbourne café, the desk with "scattered notes, two pens and a broken pencil, books piled high and a coffee cup from Paris," "late October" weather watched from the desk, blinds drawn, lamps lit, dark coffee made. The essay's events are the everyday's own temporal units — "assemblages that are inseparable from an hour, a season, an atmosphere, an air, a life" (p. 343) — and its everyday traces the humblest in the wiki's trace-register: "everyday imprints on loose covers and protectors" (p. 341). Where the page's theorists define or defend the everyday, Taylor writes it — close, gentle observation as interior design's creative act, the everyday interior's method demonstrated in the act of describing it (see temporality, trace, becoming-interior).
-
Boredom and Bedroom (Teyssot 1996/2006) — the everyday's psychological register: the habitual as the everyday's comfort-value, stated in the headnote's frame — "Psychological disturbance, whether from disease, deprivation, or suppression of the comforting habitual and repetitious nature of everyday life, forms the subject of Georges Teyssot's essay" (p. 345) — the quotidian's repetition theorized as psychic life's cushion rather than as alienation (Lefebvre), reified time (Debord) or the unthought (Perec's infra-ordinary). The register's interior: the room whose mirrored repetitions over-serve the habitual until "this mirrored interiority leads to a kind of excess of interior life, an exaggeration of introspection" (p. 346) — the everyday's own enclosure turning its comfort into boredom. Where the page's other sources ask what the everyday is or how to value it, Teyssot asks what its loss or overdose does to the psyche — the everyday as the interior's load-bearing structure. See habit, repetition, aesthetic-boredom.
-
The Construction of a Suburb (Røe 2015) — the everyday as verdict on design ideology, the mundane-pragmatism register: interviews with forty years of residence in a planned welfare-state suburb reveal "the mundane pragmatism… in addition to the mature sense of place that develops over time when people build social capital and 'collect' biographic memories… far from the architectural ideologies and the 'progressive' ideas of planners and architects" (p. 547). The everyday's evaluation-rule: "Except for the architects interviewed, the housing area is evaluated, criticized and praised for its design, layout and outdoor spaces, as part of the everyday life of its inhabitants, and not as part of a suburban counter culture" (p. 547) — the flat roof judged as snow-load and summer heat ("It isn't very practical in Norway with flat roofs," p. 545), the shop judged by walking time ("We have the shops we need, I nearly said to survive, within five minutes walking," p. 546), the neighbourhood judged by who pops in. The register also adds the everyday's community-through-problems case: delayed schools and shops "threw people together… The problems were common for all, and we could talk about them and moan. And that created a feeling of community" (p. 546). Where the wiki's theorists define or defend the everyday, Røe lets it adjudicate: the everyday as the tribunal before which planning ideology is evaluated — and mostly acquitted of mattering. See social-capital, micro-places, habit.
-
Towers in the Park, Bungalows in the Garden (Keil 2015) — the everyday suburbanism register, the everyday as the suburb's disempowered political terrain: the article's thesis names the myth-emphasis that has "disempowered other, more progressive, collective consumption-oriented and social justice-seeking forms of everyday suburbanism and the politics that result from it" (p. 579) — the everyday as where a progressive suburban politics lives, not where conservatism is housed. The register's global evidence: Drummond and Labbé's "everyday suburbanism as a global way of life" (in Keil ed., Suburban Constellations, cited pp. 591–592) — "a close look at actual social interactions in these changing morphological and social constellations" as the Global-South suburban program; and Fleischer's Beijing, where "Everyday life plays a huge role as a conduit and terrain of social differentiation" and "middle-class homeowners are increasingly aware of and willing to claim their growing power and agency in shaping the suburban space" (quoted p. 591). Where Røe's everyday is the tribunal on design ideology, Keil's is the political terrain in which a progressive suburbanism is to be recovered — the everyday as the place where suburban politics results (see everyday-suburbanism, real-existing-suburbia, social-capital).
-
The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Jacobs 1961) — the everyday's street-institutional register, the earliest source in the cluster to argue the everyday has load-bearing social structure: the sidewalk ballet as the everyday's maximal urban form ("an intricate ballet in which the individual dancers and ensembles all have distinctive parts which miraculously reinforce each other," p. 50); sidewalk contacts as "the small change from which a city's wealth of public life may grow" (p. 73) — trust, news, jobs, childcare and political capacity all grown from "ostensibly utterly trivial" errand-contact (p. 57); the everyday as privacy's producer (only those you choose to tell will know much about you, p. 58); children's assimilation happening "in the course of carrying on their other pursuits" on sidewalks, not in playgrounds (p. 86); and the analytical corollary — the everyday's "unaverage" clues (store hours, a candy store's services, who watches the corner) as the diagnostics of whether the everyday is working at all (p. 442). Where de Certeau gives the everyday its tactics and Lefebvre its critique, Jacobs gives it its infrastructure: the everyday as something planning can destroy and can (by supplying the four conditions) permit. See sidewalk-ballet, public-characters, eyes-on-the-street, practiced-place.
-
source-notes/brown-2018-touch-taste-smell-multisensory-museum
-
source-notes/gattegno-johnson-2018-ambient-environments-sentient-spaces
-
source-notes/paolucci-2022-bourdieu-and-marx-practices-of-critique
Open Questions
- Can the everyday function as a "site of resistance" without reinstating a normative philosophy of life that its own critique undermines?
- Is the everyday best understood as a neutral, taken-for-granted "paramount reality" (Berger & Luckmann), or is that very taken-for-grantedness the mystification the critical theorists (Lefebvre) diagnose? And is the everyday a coherent object at all, or a disciplinary construction (Driscoll) that dissolves into habitus (Upton)?
- Are ordinary actors compliant "cultural dopes" or active, creative producers of meaning (Conroy)? Does ethnomethodology (Garfinkel) offer a third way beyond both critical-theory dualism and the cultural-studies celebration of resistance?
- Teston both uses and half-mocks the micro-subversion tradition ("the defiant pleasure you might experience in covertly stealing shampoo from a business hotel"): do micro-subversions elevate the everyday, as she says by researching the commonplace "we elevate it" — or merely divert from its monotony, as she concedes, leaving its dullness intact? Her alternative — the everyday's "intrinsic value" grounded in the UDHR ("the responsibility to promote access to design as a basic human right") — does it escape the boredom-presupposing frame both traditions share? See right-to-design, politicizing-the-interior.
- Berger names the everyday's appropriations ("Appropriating the Everyday") as a design resource — but his frame is the death of the architect, i.e., design inviting the everyday in. Is the everyday's appropriation still the everyday once it is named, strategized, and designed-for ("resourceful 'misuse'" as programme), or does its tactical force (de Certeau) require remaining uninvited?
Theme
- The History of the Everyday — the diachronic arc of theories of the everyday (this debate staged synchronically).
Related Syntheses
- The Everyday and the Phenomenology of Place — the broad bridge between everyday-life theory and phenomenology.
- Heidegger's Dwelling, Genius Loci, and the Everyday — the thread from Heidegger's dwelling through genius loci to the everyday as dwelling's site of enactment.
- Financialisation of Architecture — everyday life as the terrain financialisation colonizes, and the potential site of resistance.
- The Everyday as the Site of Postcapitalist Desire — the everyday as the terrain where postcapitalist desire could be rebuilt affirmatively, against precorporation and recuperation.
